Features of Litigation vs. Arbitration |
|
Litigation |
Arbitration |
Public process |
Private process |
Any party can institute |
Parties must agree to use |
Adversarial procedure |
May be less adversarial |
Formal, inflexible |
Less formal, more flexible |
Statutory/Rule procedures govern |
Simpler rules of procedures; evidence rules usually not strictly applied; parties may agree to modify |
Broad discovery |
Discovery typically limited to document production; interrogatories or depositions permitted depending on selected rules of procedure |
Adjudicators are generalist judge/jury |
Arbitrators may be party-selected experts |
Adjudicators apply the law; their decision sets precedent |
Arbitrators apply party-selected standards, (law, business standards or equity); failure to apply generally is not reversible error; decisions do not set precedent |
Broad right of appeal |
Grounds to vacate award limited to arbitrator's fraud, bias and the like |
Remedies can include compensatory and punitive damages, injunctive relief |
Arbitrators can grant compensatory damages and injunctive relief; preliminary injunctive relief may be difficult to obtain on an emergency basis; parties can limit arbitrator's authority to award certain damages |
High transaction costs |
Can reduce costs |
Delay (docket) |
Usually reduces delay to commencement of hearings; hearings may be intermittent depending on selected rules of procedure and arbitrators' schedules. |
Daniel R. Denton, PC
Attorney & Mediator
P.O. Box 850
Beaufort, SC 29901
843.524.9445
DanDenton@Lawyer.com
[Home] [About Mediation] [About Dan Denton] [Procedures] [ADR Resources] [Forms] [Fees] [Contact Us]